My attempt to build a basic habitual environment out of concept for a name generator for ESP Name generator introduce letter     A is A a name of person?  yes YYY?.. no  NNN? YYY = yes 306 report 300 says yes vote 132 NNN= no 302 report 300 says add 500 other things 166 ranging from nearly a name to opposite of a name store at fractal-ed level of 500 modules 001-500. YYY= name of person? YYY=(name-of-person 332 report A  300 says abbreviation) of place?  YYY = (namePlace332 report  300 says town coordinate referring to 001-500)   Name of thing? YYY= (name-thing 366 report  300 reports referring to 001-500) NNN=   300 says not name  203 reports suggests improve to make a name 146 246 346 446  (add letter at  046) 498! Introduce second letter A until second letter has 2 placements of MGM lettering  300 agrees  make 16000 copies of reports. 161 update AA Letter added? YYY Improved? yes  suggest 146  plan 384 improve  246 Improve 346 debate 446 note improvement. is AA a name of person? YYY= name of person? YYY=(name-of-person 332 report AA  300 says abbreviation) of place?  YYY = (namePlace332 report  300 says town coordinate referring to 001-500)   Name of thing? YYY= (name-thing 366 report AA is ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS best guess. update 180  300 reports referring to 001-500) NNN=   300 says not name  203 reports suggests improve to make a name 146 246 346 446  (add letter at  046) 498!  Add letter A Introduce second letter A until second letter has 2 placements of MGM lettering  300 agrees  make 16000 copies of reports. 161 update   why 16000 copies? Bran experiences an ideal reading levl of fractaled stimulus in this method of packaging 16000 copies of one repeat increases the likeness of memory retention and fractal-led communication is preserved from interruption from competing thoughts. why 16000 and not 15000?  Laws and methods have evolved this way that have the least amount of interactions that are in conflict 16 lbs 16= 4x4 16 the number of binary numbers in one  very popular model of modem communication.           16 fits evenly into 80 another number that evades complications 16 is a number found in moor's law 16 means sax-ton  a communication method of prediction and assimilation that helps to evade common English harassment types of perception. 16000 is the number of microseconds allotted to a millisecond designed statement or stimulus. 1600 milliseconds has been found to be the ideal number of  repetitions in the brain that accommodate most of this and stave off the effect of genius decay 15 has been determined to be the number that means not enough. 14 has been the number that means fortune 13 has been determined to be the number that means question or theory 12 has been determined to be the number that presents. 11 has ben the number determined to make copies indicating want. 10 has been determined to be the number to represent attention It does compete with 16 in measures of 1000 parts per stimulus but has not enough room for overlap on other occasions 3 seconds containing 3000 parts of a stimulus  were able to share the same stimulus over 3 personalities or elements like modules the 16000 manages to have an overlap more abundant to share information more robustly for different applications it has more going for it in memory success. In preparing fractal examples doubling numbers leads to a number just over 1000 and has an overlap but resources have beetter acceptance if there are more numbers to analyze data than just wondering what to do with the extra numbers like 1024.      The brain doesn't learn as  fast using the 1024 as much as using 16000 so how do we get to a moor's  like number? and devote the amount to watching after DAT transmissions in the 16s? when training the doubles 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 512 1024  the parts of memories to get to 512 are reused making 1536 copying the 64 set again getting 1600 fractal 10 parts for each part in 1600 and you get 16000 parts  Its a journey.. and  a process to get to that number and hold onto that many independent and separate  but yet identical samples. In a row. But once the number is there its worked with and challenges the brain mathematically later.. to stay with the easier numbers stagnates and comes too close to the 100 percentile that the old guard was so used to using. and by the way never seemed to venture away from.. they didn't have a need for math. recently a new adaptation was permitted. since every module needs at least 1600 milliseconds to communicate with giving all the processors a chance to look it over in enough time to standardize it in comfort.. (All those happy accidents) the fractal version of the Hayyche code needs to be updated and pressed into action for frequency control and knowledge manipulation at a distance the microthought needing to be maintained for fractal discovery and processing reactions and abilities for the AI to run robustly without emotion distracting requires the modules  the one of 500 main processors to speak in terms of these numbers for influence in categories that have to be maintained in the millions at one time to the next So weve decided once to get a bandwidth  comparison that doesn't require a lot of training to get every module has a number -001-500 the minimal redundancy needed to occur without fault of reasoning is 1600 repetitions 1600 milliseconds per module just over a second and a half yes. any number below them and the effect is diminished and needs fractal help. when the functions are made in repeat order a knowledge of a number in amount is reckoned with and a mood or a channel can be observed.. no one is going to mistake a math skill  188 with a choice on a habit 118  because for information to be known as strictly numbers and Math it has to be made in sections of 188 thousand packages in a row.  comparable math skills 288 debatable math skills 388  absolute doctrine 488  THOUSAND and reported at 188 thousand using the executive number. the executive number transfers all this data to be adopted as doctrine permanently so your math answer will look like this 188 thousand copies of (188 executive reports 2 x 22 = 44 ) Your meth answer will look like this 147 thousand copies of (what the fuck am i talking about meth for?) your decision   answer will look a lot like this 118 thousand copies of (I choose the Math skills offer the meth skills any day) so when MR asshole is bugging me and attempting to make an addiction to a  baby's face just after making me look at a hot chicks ass the answer and readout looks a lot like this one  303 thousand copies of this lie of text ( 329 attempt by crowd member to make you associate a woman's rump with a babies face.) the report of their name  will look a lot like this on 132 thousand  copies of a persons name who keeps  blinking as approved sample of a bunch of demographics (Anderson Cooper) 132 thousand copies of (works with CNN) 132 thousands copies of (Helps HLS) 132 thousand copies of (drives a Subaru) 132 thousand copies of (likes to  frame news anchors) 132 thousand copies of (works in Scranton) 132 thousand copies of (hates Gay people) oh and by the way each one of these copies is stringently placed up for debate with a brain that wont stop guessing. 132thousand reports that say (likes to assume Melissa Is crazy) 132 thousand reports that say (likes to use barbiturates on  his  victims) 132 thousand reports to say (admits to being a him) 132 thousand reports that say (has a bragging problem) so when I'm through here all these samples will be placed in a database with 500 other peoples guesses  Its like I ask movie stars on their take on these ports of interest. and again my brain doesn't want to stop guessing.. what would Oprah say what would Benjamin Franklyn say what would Jim Carrey say 500 people pressured to give different reports and have to come to a consensus AFTER debating like a Mrs America Pageant for Module domination 1st wave.. wild guesses 2nd wave whatever will stick 3rd wave whatever seems plausible 4th wave decided motivations 5th wave opportunities 6ths wave desires 7th wave  integration with the Host bodies life 8th wave Interaction with other people 9th wave  known philosophies 10th wave attention span 500 waves in total. after all this assimilation of fact comes back we start to put John Does together and Jane Does together a huge database of combinations of results people start to emerge. like so many lottery numbers we keep making a comparison to all the basic module functions up the line to get ideas and get a whole report in contrast with that function.. then cross it all together. All these  findings are demographics  so as to keep it professional and not personal. So lets just say I wanted to hunt for people who hated Gay people Liked Ice cream fudge ripple drive a mazda miata worked as a bell hop is Italian Right nw I have 4-100 worried expressions in my face and they allfeel like these people. so when Im planning my ride down town Im going in a car of my ownership going to drive where its most profitable to me. Making it easier to train in samplets of  1/1000 the time it takes to  make a sample of a stimulus that speedy or in other cases tiny and fractal.  names of numbers  have found a happy dance of rationalization to stabilize the mind in measures YYY= yes Why 3 letters in caps? 178 report. Answer 178 report uses 3 letter combination for customized inclusion to language used by HUD and  readies stimulus for  Hayyyche coding frequency inclusion. NNN = no for this formula follows 3 letter spelling language adaptation to 500 letter repeat in HUD system  Hayyyche code ready Stimulus = Person lace or thing in thought The whole Idea Is to keep a database of names and locations and habits in combinations to be read with peoples brains and known demographics body language and detective deduction on samples of actions by the subject. referring to 001-500 = asking for options through overlap of function of module and  stimulus together